Excellent reply from Matteo here, with the limited information you have provided this will be have to be guesswork.
A sudden drop normally means something has broken by exceeded MAASP, and MAASP is NOT a constant. If you for instance have influx of fluid into a gas filled annulus or a temperature change occurs, the value can change significantly.
One possibility is that you have extended a fracture at the production casing shoe. The B-annulus drop may be caused by less ballooning effect of the reduced A-annulus pressure, but without absolute pressures it is not possible to conclude. Careful study of A&B pressures combined with volumes and compressibility of annulus contents should give the answers to this.
------------------------------
Vidar Rygg
Project Manager
Sandaband Well Plugging
Tananger
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: Dec 08,2014 04:28 AM
From: Matteo Loizzo
Subject: Sudden pressure drop in annuluses
Hi Nijat,
Two trivial questions: was the pressure sustained, i.e. have you already bled it off and then it returned to the previous value? And second: was the pressure drop event caused by human action, e.g. bleeding off either A or B annulus, or changing production schedules? It would also be useful to know the absolute value of the pressures before and after the drop.
We can nonetheless attempt a few wild speculations, and suggest how you could test them:
- If there is pressure in the A and B annulus that may imply a shallow hydraulic connection - mind that an alternative hypothesis is that both are connected to a (deep) source, but the production casing and the wellhead are sealed.
- The annulus pressure may actually be due to production. Maybe your tubing packer never sealed and you production casing is leaking. Or maybe the SCP is due to a shallower source of pressurized fluids. You should be able to tell these two hypotheses apart based on pressure behavior.
- You seem to suggest that the sustained pressure values are different in both annuli. This could imply that the leak pathway can let through some gas to the top of each annulus, but doesn't allow annular fluids to escape. A related possibility is that the leak points through the two barrier elements (completion and production casing) are at different depths. The fact that it took long for pressure to drop and build up again seem to confirm that the leakage pathway is small.
- The first hypothesis that comes to mind is that the pressure drop was caused by a barrier element failure and that the flow out of both annuli slowly pressurized a secondary closed container. Since pressure dropped in 2 hours and then took longer to climb again, it is possible that this new failure is "larger" than the initial leakage pathway so pressure had to drop to an equilibrium value between all three containers (A+B annulus as well as the new unknown one). It should be fairly easy to infer sizes of containers and pathways from the pressure vs. time behavior. The secondary container must be closed (or at least leaking far less than the A+B annulus pathway) since pressure built up back to the original value.
- A possibility is that your intermediate casing (or your wellhead seal) failed and you recharged the C annulus. This, again, should be easy to test. It is less likely that you're leaking into a formation and very unlikely that you're leaking into an open system (surface aquifer or atmosphere).
Now another question: was the maximum pressure in the B annulus constant through the operation life or recently spiked? The reason for asking is that if the casing properties degraded with time, then the same is likely to happen with your newly pressurized container, and you may have a leak at surface within a few months.
Please remember that any assumption should be tested against all available evidence to come up with plausible explanations. And let me know if the above deductions are not clear and I need to reformulate them.
Best of luck,
Matteo
------------------------------
Matteo Loizzo
Well integrity consultant
Berlin
------------------------------