Comparative Solution Project

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno

Dear Bruno, 

The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

Best regards, 

Jan

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno

Dear Jan,

Thank you so much for the help. My sparse results make sense now.

Regarding Problem C, the "check_format.py" considers that 10 columns are expected for case C. This would be the same number as case B. However, I thought that including a column for the y coordinates (or v in this case) would be required since this is a 3D case.

I would appreciate it if you could clarify.

Best regards,

Bruno

Dear Bruno, 

The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

Best regards, 

Jan

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno

Hi Bruno, 

Thank you for spotting this! I fixed it.

Kind regards 

Bernd 

Original Message:
Sent: 05-27-2024 06:57 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Jan,

Thank you so much for the help. My sparse results make sense now.

Regarding Problem C, the "check_format.py" considers that 10 columns are expected for case C. This would be the same number as case B. However, I thought that including a column for the y coordinates (or v in this case) would be required since this is a 3D case.

I would appreciate it if you could clarify.

Best regards,

Bruno

Original Message:
Sent: 05-26-2024 02:28 PM
From: Jan Nordbotten
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Bruno, 

The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

Best regards, 

Jan

Original Message:
Sent: 05-24-2024 08:16 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno

Dear Prof. Flemisch:

In the spe11c case. Do we need to add a column of y coordinates to the spatial map file? Or will the organizer calculate the corresponding y values ​​from the z coordinates when visualizing?

Best regards

Chaojie

Original Message:
Sent: 05-28-2024 09:46 AM
From: Bernd Flemisch
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Hi Bruno, 

Thank you for spotting this! I fixed it.

Kind regards 

Bernd 

Original Message:
Sent: 05-27-2024 06:57 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Jan,

Thank you so much for the help. My sparse results make sense now.

Regarding Problem C, the "check_format.py" considers that 10 columns are expected for case C. This would be the same number as case B. However, I thought that including a column for the y coordinates (or v in this case) would be required since this is a 3D case.

I would appreciate it if you could clarify.

Best regards,

Bruno

Original Message:
Sent: 05-26-2024 02:28 PM
From: Jan Nordbotten
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Bruno, 

The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

Best regards, 

Jan

Original Message:
Sent: 05-24-2024 08:16 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno

Hi Chaojie, 

Yes, please add a column for the y coordinate between the x and the z coordinate. 

Kind regards 

Bernd 

Dear Prof. Flemisch:

In the spe11c case. Do we need to add a column of y coordinates to the spatial map file? Or will the organizer calculate the corresponding y values ​​from the z coordinates when visualizing?

Best regards

Chaojie

Original Message:
Sent: 05-28-2024 09:46 AM
From: Bernd Flemisch
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Hi Bruno, 

Thank you for spotting this! I fixed it.

Kind regards 

Bernd 

Original Message:
Sent: 05-27-2024 06:57 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Jan,

Thank you so much for the help. My sparse results make sense now.

Regarding Problem C, the "check_format.py" considers that 10 columns are expected for case C. This would be the same number as case B. However, I thought that including a column for the y coordinates (or v in this case) would be required since this is a 3D case.

I would appreciate it if you could clarify.

Best regards,

Bruno

Original Message:
Sent: 05-26-2024 02:28 PM
From: Jan Nordbotten
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Dear Bruno, 

The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

Best regards, 

Jan

Original Message:
Sent: 05-24-2024 08:16 PM
From: Bruno Ramon Fernandes
Subject: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

Hi,

I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

Any help would be appreciated.

Best regards,

Bruno