Comparative Solution Project

 View Only
  • 1.  Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 05-24-2024 08:17 PM

    Hi,

    I am a bit confused with the reporting of CO2 amounts (solubilized, mobile, immobile, etc) for Case B.

    The nominal thickness (dY) for case A is clearly 0.01m but the value for case B is not clearly stated.

    A value is required to properly report the CO2 amounts in the sparse data. Is it 1 meter?

    Any help would be appreciated.

    Best regards,

    Bruno



  • 2.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 29 days ago

    Dear Bruno, 

    The nominal depth of case 11B is stated in the description as 1m (bullet point 6 after Figure 5.). 

    Best regards, 

    Jan




  • 3.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 28 days ago

    Dear Jan,

    Thank you so much for the help. My sparse results make sense now.

    Regarding Problem C, the "check_format.py" considers that 10 columns are expected for case C. This would be the same number as case B. However, I thought that including a column for the y coordinates (or v in this case) would be required since this is a 3D case.

    I would appreciate it if you could clarify.

    Best regards,

    Bruno




  • 4.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 27 days ago

    Hi Bruno, 

    Thank you for spotting this! I fixed it.

    Kind regards 

    Bernd 




  • 5.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 25 days ago
    Edited by Chaojie Di 25 days ago

    Dear Prof. Flemisch:

    In the spe11c case. Do we need to add a column of y coordinates to the spatial map file? Or will the organizer calculate the corresponding y values ​​from the z coordinates when visualizing?

    Best regards

    Chaojie




  • 6.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 24 days ago

    Hi Chaojie, 

    Yes, please add a column for the y coordinate between the x and the z coordinate. 

    Kind regards 

    Bernd 




  • 7.  RE: Nominal thickness for reporting results to Case B

    Posted 23 days ago

    Dear Prof. Flemisch:

    Copy that! Much appreciated!

    Best regards

    Chaojie